Ameritianity - America's Christian Responsibility

Ameritianity Home

NEWTS BILLIONAIRE SUPPORT

OBAMA SOTU 2012

MITT ROMNEY - 2012

ROMNEY ON HIS FAITH

Mitt's Favorite Songs

INCOME OPPORTUNITY

TODAYS DEMOCRAT PARTY

AGENDA 21

An American Coup

Reader Comments

Video Library

The How of Christianity

"Acceptionalism?"

Planned Destruction

Love America?

Business in America

Humanism vs Christianity

Executive Power

IMPEACH? YES!!

HealthCare Part 1

HealthCare Part 2

ROMNEY on Pollution

Muslim Schools & Your Tax

Americanism v. Obama

Obama in El Paso 05.10.11

Obama catches Osama

Blacks Who Love America

Alinsky Praises Obama

Narcissistic Power

Editorial: 03/22/2011

Anti-White Male Programs

The American Flag

HealthCare Compact

2012 Candidates

...and the Bible says...

Educational Freedom

Abortion & Taxpayers

Children of America

George Washington Vision?

Islam v. American Freedom

Immigration

Self-Defense/1 Samuel 17

Support Freedom Alliance

Christian Manifesto

Christian Freedom?

Video Fun?

Editorial 01/25/2011

MLK 2011

Lib-Talkers Video

Black Race Exploiters

Discussions

"No Sharia" say Muslims

Left Honor Christian Left

Liberalism & America 2010

Liberal Christian Speak

Liberalism in the Church

Liberal "Leaders"

Obama 11/02/2010

"Americanism" Defined

Christian Military Family

The Economic Facts

Repeal of ObamaDontCare

Views on the Mosque

More Views on the Mosque

No to Anchor Babies

Billions on "Education?"

Catholic Voters

Lord of The Harvest

The Science of Creation

The DEFICIT Party

What's Happening?

Tired But Never Defeated

Anti-Americans at Work

Our American Heritage

Athiests Lose One

Left's Object of Worship

A Planned Parenthood Loss

"Leak City" 07/30/2010

The Faces of Power?

Obama's Stated Plans

80 Socialists in Congress

Muslim Sharia Law??

Muslim Admission?

Phyllis Schlafly

Patriotism Today

Christian Family News

Kagan Not For Court

President of No Nation

Financial Crisis Facts

Manhattan Declaration

Mount Vernon Statement

The Holy Spirit

Rumors of Armageddon

Mayflower Compact

USA Day of Prayer

Jesus in the O.T.

Abortion & Small Families

Radical/Liberal Rule Book

Christian Nation?

Obama & Christianity

Un-American Activities

Video & Audio

New World Order?

Christianity in the USA

Paradigm

Waterboarding For LIFE

Links

The Muslim & the Blackman

Healthcare & Prosper

"Health?" Care?

Nationalized Healthcare

More Power than President

Latest Obama Appointees

Another Obama Czar

Obama & Educating Kids

Sacrifice for Others

"It Can't Happen Here?"

Arrogance?

No Obama Mandate

Success in the USA

Remembering 9/11

THE Baptist Standard

WBRC

Click Above

Alinski's Rules: Must Reading In Obama Era

By PHYLLIS SCHLAFLY | Posted Monday, February 02, 2009 4:20 PM PT    VISIT: Eagle Forum.Org

Immediately after the Democratic National Convention in Colorado, the Boston Globe published a letter from David Alinsky. He boasted about how Barack Obama had made effective use of his training in the methods of David's late father, the famous Chicago radical, Saul Alinsky.

David Alinsky gloated: "I am proud to see that my father's model for organizing is being applied successfully beyond local community organizing to affect the Democratic campaign in 2008. It is a fine tribute to Saul Alinsky as we approach his 100th birthday."

What was Saul Alinsky's model that Barack Obama used so successfully to defeat the Clinton machine plus the Republican Party in a dramatic one-two punch never before seen in politics?

What is known today as "the Alinsky ideology and Alinsky concepts of mass organization for power" are fully set forth in Alinsky's 1971 book, "Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals." Alinsky's worldview was that mankind is divided into three parts: "the haves, the have-nots and the have-a-little, want mores." His purpose was to teach the have-nots how to take power and money away from the haves by creating mass organizations to seize power, and he admitted "this means revolution."

He wanted a radical change of America's social and economic structure, and he planned to achieve that through creating public discontent and moral confusion. Alinsky developed strategies to achieve power through mass organization, and organizing was his word for revolution.

He wanted to move the U.S. from capitalism to socialism, where the means of production would be owned by all the people (i.e., the government). A believer in economic determinism, he viewed unemployment, disease, crime and bigotry as byproducts of capitalism. "Change" was Alinsky's favorite word, used on page after page. "I will argue," he wrote, "that man's hopes lie in the acceptance of the great law of change."

Alinsky used what he called "general concepts of change" to move us toward "a science of revolution."

What he called change meant an alteration of our socioeconomic structure; what he called organizing meant pursuing confrontational political tactics.

Alinsky taught the have-nots to "hate the establishment of the haves" because they have "power, money, food, security and luxury." He claimed that "justice, morality, law and order are mere words used by the haves to justify and secure their status quo."

Alinsky didn't ignore traditional moral standards or dismiss them as unnecessary. He was more devious; he taught his followers that "moral rationalization is indispensable at all times of action whether to justify the selection or the use of ends or means."

To achieve his goals, he sought local community organizers who projected confidence and vision as well as change. Barack Obama fit the profile.

Alinsky didn't want just talkers. He wanted radicals who were prepared to take bold action to organize the discontented, precipitate crises, grab power and transform society. He taught his organizers how to infiltrate existing institutions such as churches, unions and political parties, gain influence in them and introduce change.

The qualities Alinsky looked for in a good organizer were ego ("reaching for the highest level for which man can reach — to create, to be a 'great creator,' to play God"), curiosity (raising "questions that agitate, that break through the accepted pattern"), irreverence ("nothing is sacred"; "detests dogma, defies any finite definition of morality"), a sense of humor ("the most potent weapons known to mankind are satire and ridicule") and a personality with confidence in presenting the right reason for his actions only "as a moral rationalization after the right end has been achieved."

The organizer must "rub raw the resentments of the people of the community, fan the latent hostilities of many of the people to the point of overt expression. . . . stir up dissatisfaction and discontent."

Alinsky trained his community organizers to adopt a "middle-class identity" and familiarity with their "values and problems." After achieving "the priceless value of his middle-class experience," he will "begin to dissect and examine that way of life as he never has before."

Alinsky's trainees are instructed to return to the suburban scene of the middle class with its variety of organizations, from PTAs to League of Women Voters, consumer groups, churches and clubs. Alinsky boasted: "With rare exceptions, our activists and radicals are products of and rebels against our middle-class society. . . . Our rebels have contemptuously rejected the values and way of life of the middle class."

Put "Rules for Radicals" on your must-read list if you want to understand much of contemporary politics.

Copyright 2008 Creators Syndicate, Inc



© 2008-2011 Ameritianity.com


FAIR USE NOTICE: For all videos and anything used on this site by "Ameritianity:" "This blog or any content herein or on our facebook site may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. This material is distributed without profit. This blog does not always agree with certain personal views of the published authors, but I will overlook such views many times in order to gain knowledge from the more important subject matter of the article/op-ed."