Ameritianity - America's Christian Responsibility

Ameritianity Home

NEWTS BILLIONAIRE SUPPORT

OBAMA SOTU 2012

MITT ROMNEY - 2012

ROMNEY ON HIS FAITH

Mitt's Favorite Songs

INCOME OPPORTUNITY

TODAYS DEMOCRAT PARTY

AGENDA 21

An American Coup

Reader Comments

Video Library

The How of Christianity

"Acceptionalism?"

Planned Destruction

Love America?

Business in America

Humanism vs Christianity

Executive Power

IMPEACH? YES!!

HealthCare Part 1

HealthCare Part 2

ROMNEY on Pollution

Muslim Schools & Your Tax

Americanism v. Obama

Obama in El Paso 05.10.11

Obama catches Osama

Blacks Who Love America

Alinsky Praises Obama

Narcissistic Power

Editorial: 03/22/2011

Anti-White Male Programs

The American Flag

HealthCare Compact

2012 Candidates

...and the Bible says...

Educational Freedom

Abortion & Taxpayers

Children of America

George Washington Vision?

Islam v. American Freedom

Immigration

Self-Defense/1 Samuel 17

Support Freedom Alliance

Christian Manifesto

Christian Freedom?

Video Fun?

Editorial 01/25/2011

MLK 2011

Lib-Talkers Video

Black Race Exploiters

Discussions

"No Sharia" say Muslims

Left Honor Christian Left

Liberalism & America 2010

Liberal Christian Speak

Liberalism in the Church

Liberal "Leaders"

Obama 11/02/2010

"Americanism" Defined

Christian Military Family

The Economic Facts

Repeal of ObamaDontCare

Views on the Mosque

More Views on the Mosque

No to Anchor Babies

Billions on "Education?"

Catholic Voters

Lord of The Harvest

The Science of Creation

The DEFICIT Party

What's Happening?

Tired But Never Defeated

Anti-Americans at Work

Our American Heritage

Athiests Lose One

Left's Object of Worship

A Planned Parenthood Loss

"Leak City" 07/30/2010

The Faces of Power?

Obama's Stated Plans

80 Socialists in Congress

Muslim Sharia Law??

Muslim Admission?

Phyllis Schlafly

Patriotism Today

Christian Family News

Kagan Not For Court

President of No Nation

Financial Crisis Facts

Manhattan Declaration

Mount Vernon Statement

The Holy Spirit

Rumors of Armageddon

Mayflower Compact

USA Day of Prayer

Jesus in the O.T.

Abortion & Small Families

Radical/Liberal Rule Book

Christian Nation?

Obama & Christianity

Un-American Activities

Video & Audio

New World Order?

Christianity in the USA

Paradigm

Waterboarding For LIFE

Links

The Muslim & the Blackman

Healthcare & Prosper

"Health?" Care?

Nationalized Healthcare

More Power than President

Latest Obama Appointees

Another Obama Czar

Obama & Educating Kids

Sacrifice for Others

"It Can't Happen Here?"

Arrogance?

No Obama Mandate

Success in the USA

Remembering 9/11

THE Baptist Standard

WBRC

HEALTHCARE PART 1


  See all about "RickPerryCare" - the State of Texas tax payor supported (Just like Mass.) / Texas Legislature Created (Just Like Mass.) / Texas Department of Insurance Regulated / Gov. Perry Supported / .. http://healthytexasonline.com/documents/Employer_Facts.pdf

 

"We the people" must accept Personal Responsibility or
our Personal Responsibility will be accepted for us!

Your "Freedom and Liberty" does not
come at the expense of anothers!
(Unless you really need the help and then Americans will teach you to be Personally Responsable.)


"On April 12, 2006 Governor Mitt Romney signed the health legislation.[14] He vetoed 8 sections of the health care legislation, including the controversial employer assessment.[15] Romney also vetoed provisions providing dental benefits to poor residents on the Medicaid program, and providing health coverage to senior and disabled legal immigrants not eligible for federal Medicaid.[16][17] The legislature promptly overrode six of the eight gubernatorial section vetoes, on May 4, 2006, and by mid-June 2006 had overridden the remaining two.[18]"

Don't be fooled. HealthCare in Mass was created and designed by the most Liberal Legislature, in the most Liberal State, for the most Liberal people in America. They got what they wanted . . . and it was over the VETO of Mitt Romney.

Massachusetts health care reform  LINK

Yes! Something must be done about HealthCare in America. It is time to get real and get passed the MYTHS and the blame game.

Why we don’t want HealthCare to be handled at the Federal level.

(1) We don’t want the Federal Government to have such power over 17% of the economy;
(2) We don’t want HealthCare to become a “political football” or reward for political loyalty;
(3) We know that historically raising taxes at the federal level does not guarantee they will be used for the purpose for which they were collected/paid;
(4) Existing law provides that insurance be regulated at the state level which has served us well;
(5) By regulating insurance at the state level, there will be fifty entities working on solutions rather than one;
(6) Fifty entities working will provide for greater innovation and creativity with better results;
(7) The THREAT of a Federal Government takeover of HealthCare / Health Insurance in America - for over 20 years - has caused companies to delay expansion and investment in HealthCare - which has led to less competition and availability of insurance options. 

What are the problems?

(1) People in the country illegally are getting benefits;
(2) Some citizens chose to be “free-riders” in that they can afford insurance but are irresponsible and see nothing wrong with other tax and premium payers paying their medical expenses;
(3) “Free-riders” know we will not just allow the uninsured ill or injured to go without care;
(4) Some don’t seem understand that “Insurance” is risk sharing. You can’t wait until you need insurance to purchase it. You don’t buy home insurance after your home catches on fire or a tornado is sighted;
(5) We don’t trust government. We don’t trust the insurance companies. We don’t trust individuals;
(6)  There currently are uninsured Americans / uninsurable Americans;
(7) You can’t be a successful business by providing insurance in cases when you know you will lose money, or compete when other companies don’t take the same risks your company takes;
(8) For decades, the threat and rumors of implementing a Federal Mandate / Single Payer Plan has caused insurers NOT to make the investment to enter the health insurance arena or expand it. Put the idea to bed once and for all and we will see more competition, investment, and availability;
(9) Legal and Tort reform is needed in some states where such legislature is lacking;


What are some solutions?

(1) If you are illegal and require medical care and have no insurance or the ability to pay NOW, you will be provided for to the point of being able to travel and will then be transported/deported to your home nation at their expenses and they will pay your medical bills –or- you will be deported to your home nation and any expenses for transport and treatment will be deducted from any aid given to that country or collected via taxes on imports from that country. “Anchor Babies” must be retroactively ended. No citizen parents – no citizenship;
(2) Like it or not, people who are so selfish or irresponsible that they refuse to provide for the possible expense for medical care in the event of an illness or accident , which results in other citizens having to pay their expenses via taxes or higher premiums, must be REGULATED and required to pay their own way. We require auto insurance liability. We require a business owner to provide life insurance to cover a business loan to protect the bank and its stockholders. Home insurance is required to protect the mortgage company and their stockholders. Requiring people to be responsible when it comes to medical insurance is not unreasonable or anti-freedom. No one has a right to become a burden on others ;
(3) When there is lack of trust or the likelihood of abuse, we must have regulation. Regulation is much like having checks and balances and division of powers in government, and stock holders meetings in business. The HealthCare industry must be regulated to minimize the chance of corruption. Every man for himself will not work when billions of dollars is at stake;
(4) The only way to be sure everyone has access to healthcare insurance is to regulate that all companies must accept all applicants. This puts everyone in one pool, makes coverage affordably to everyone, and spreads the risk over the entire population; (“high risk pools” that are unaffordable accomplish nothing)
(5) States will regulate health insurance companies by seeing to it that they accept all applicants, don’t drop anyone, provide coverage that meets minimum guidelines, pay claims properly and timely;
(6) Once someone is insured, they should never be able to be dropped. Children put on parents policies at birth will be able to continue the same coverage later by simply converting to their own policy for the same premium being charged similar insured’s with a small billing/admin fee added;
(7) In the same way that we require payroll deductions, and other collections methods, for child support when parents refuse to accept responsibility, those who refuse to accept financial responsibility for their own healthcare, and that of their family members, should be subject to the same enforcement methods;

What are the real objectives?

(1) Cover everyone in a system that is win/win for all parties – in the private sector;
(2) Have EVERYONE paying into the pool of money from which claims are paid thus increasing that pool and reducing the costs for everyone;
(3) Regulate out fraud, mismanagement, uninsured people, lack of ability to keep coverage in case of job loss, age, or family situation, lack of affordability.


LINK:  GO TO HEALTHCARE PART 2



© 2008-2011 Ameritianity.com


FAIR USE NOTICE: For all videos and anything used on this site by "Ameritianity:" "This blog or any content herein or on our facebook site may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. This material is distributed without profit. This blog does not always agree with certain personal views of the published authors, but I will overlook such views many times in order to gain knowledge from the more important subject matter of the article/op-ed."